The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

September 23, 2026

In Borovicanin v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Assn., the Court denied the appellant’s emergency motion to vacate the appellate court stay of the case, and to restore the trial court’s preliminary injunction.

---

In State ex rel. Jones v. Pittman, the Court ordered the relator to file a response, if she chooses, by Friday, Sept. 25, to the respondent’s motion to dismiss the case or, in the alternative, for a judgment on the pleadings.

---

State ex rel. Bradford v. Bur. of Sentence Computation

---

In State v. Bryant, the Court appointed the Office of the Ohio Public Defender to represent the appellee.

---

September 22, 2026

In State ex rel. Derrig v. LaRose, the Court permitted Ninth District Court of Appeals Judge Nathan H. Manning to intervene as a respondent, and directed him to file his evidence and merit brief no later than 4 p.m., Thursday, Sept. 24.

---

In State ex rel. Koebel v. Erie Cty. Bd. of Elections, the Court permitted Caleb Stidham to intervene as a respondent and directed him to file his evidence and merit brief no later than 4 p.m., Thursday, Sept. 24.

---

Perrigo Sales Corp. v. Harris

---

In Perrigo Sales Corp. v. Harris, the Court ruled that a generic drugmaker paid the appropriate amount of Ohio commercial activity tax based on the amount distributors actually paid for the drugs rather than the typically higher list prices.

---

September 18, 2026

State ex rel. Kidd v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Elections

---

In State ex rel. Kidd v. Clinton Cty. Bd. of Elections, the Court ruled that a citizen initiative to add data center regulations to the city of Wilmington’s zoning code cannot appear on the Nov. 3 general election.

---

In State ex rel. Koebel v. Erie Cty. Bd. of Elections, the Court ordered the respondents to file an answer to the relator’s amended complaint by Friday, Sept. 18.

---

The Supreme Court has released the following case announcement.

---

September 17, 2026

In Borovicanin v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Assn., the Court ordered appellee National Collegiate Athletic Association to file a response, if it chooses, by 9 a.m., Monday, Sept. 21, to the appellant’s emergency motion to vacate the appellate court stay of the case, and to restore the trial court’s preliminary injunction.

---

In Dayton Bar Assn. v. Baker, the Court found Christine Baker of Dayton in contempt for failure to file an affidavit of compliance.

---

September 16, 2026

The Supreme Court has released the following case announcement.

---

In State ex rel. Derrig v. LaRose, the Court ordered the respondents to file an answer to the amended complaint by 4 p.m., Friday, Sept. 18.

---

In State ex rel. Derrig v. LaRose, the Court ordered the respondents to file an answer to the complaint by 4 p.m., Friday, Sept. 18.

---

CheckFree Servs. Corp. v. Harris

---

In CheckFree Servs. Corp. v. Harris, the Court directed the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals to clarify its decision on how the board resolved the taxability of more than $320,000 in sales tax collected in connection with a financial services company’s disbursement-authorization service.

---

September 15, 2026

Sheetz, Inc. v. Centerville

---

The Court accepted Neal v. Durrani for review.

---

In Sheetz, Inc. v. Centerville, the Court ruled that developers of a Sheetz service station can pursue a second lawsuit against a city for thwarting its plans to open a new store.

---

September 14, 2026

State ex rel. Ontko v. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Elections

---

State ex rel. Ontko v. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Elections

---

In State ex rel. Koebel v. Erie Cty. Bd. of Elections, the Court ordered the respondents to file an answer to the complaint by 4 p.m., Thursday, Sept. 17.

---

In State ex rel. Ontko v. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Elections, the Court ruled that it cannot order a board of elections to remove a suspended judge seeking reelection from the Nov. 3 general election ballot.

---

The Court released the following case announcement.

---

In In re Application of Ohio Edison Co., the Court allowed the Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel and the Northwest Ohio Aggregation Coalition to intervene and participate in the case.

---