Skip to main content

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System






Daily Case Announcements
& Opinions GovDelivery

March 3, 2026

The Court accepted State v. Thurmond and State v. Reed and held them for a decision in State v. Striblin.


The Court dismissed State ex rel. Schaffer v. Butler Cty. Sheriff’s Office with a dissenting opinion.


March 2, 2026

The Court published official versions of seven opinions, which were previously released as slip opinions.


February 27, 2026

In State ex rel. Mason v. Basinger, the Court modified the judgment and denied the request for a writ.


State ex rel. Mason v. Basinger


February 26, 2026

Eddy v. Farmers Property Cas. Ins. Co.


State ex rel. Patterson v. Starn


Peace v. Galloway


Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hall


In Eddy v. Farmers Property Cas. Ins. Co., the Court ruled a trial judge must inspect the documents in an insurance claims file before releasing any of them to a couple who alleged their insurance company acted in bad faith.


February 25, 2026

In State ex rel. DeGraff v. Ottawa Cty. Bd. of Elections, the Court denied a request for a writ ordering a board of elections to remove a zoning amendment referendum from the May 2026 primary-election ballot.


State ex rel. DeGraff v. Ottawa Cty. Bd. of Elections


729 W. 130th St., L.L.C. v. Hinckley Twp. Bd of Zoning Appeals


Donald Sullivan, L.L.C. v. Reynolds


State ex rel. Suburban Driving School, L.L.C. v. Bur. of Workers' Comp.


State ex rel. Wright v. Madison Cty. Clerk of Courts


In 729 W. 130th St. LLC v Hinckley Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, the Court ruled that an appeal by Medina County property owners of a zoning inspector’s “decision” that they couldn’t reopen a tavern was premature.


The Court denied the appellant’s request for oral argument in In re A.B., with a dissenting opinion.


In State v. Barton and State v. Burrell (2025-0952 and 2025-0962), the Court granted the Ohio attorney general’s requests to participate in oral argument in both cases.


February 24, 2026

In re RPA Energy, Inc.


In re RPA Energy, Inc.


State ex rel. Teagarden v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.


State ex rel. Harris v. Rothgery


State ex rel. Martin v. McCormick


In In re RPA Energy, Inc., the Court upheld a ban on an energy supplier from doing business in the state, but ordered a $1.44 million penalty against the company to be recalculated.


February 23, 2026

In Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Smith, the Court reinstated Robert Smith III of Twinsburg to the practice of law.


Word files may be viewed for free with Office Online.

PDF Files may be viewed, printed, and searched using the Free Acrobat® Reader. Acrobat Reader is a trademark of Adobe Inc.